Volume No. :   8

Issue No. :  4

Year :  2018

ISSN Print :  2231-5705

ISSN Online :  2231-5713


Registration

Allready Registrered
Click to Login

Evaluation of five Different Marketed Brands of Paracetamol Tablets using Quality Control Tests



Address:   Ganesh B. Vambhurkar*, Asha M. Jagtap, Akshata S. Gavade, Manish D. Rajput, Hrutuja V. Kambale, Manohar D. Kengar.
Rajarambapu College of Pharmacy, Kasegaon, Dist–Sangli, Maharashtra, INDIA–415404.
*Corresponding Author
DOI No: 10.5958/2231-5713.2018.00035.1

ABSTRACT:
In most cases, supplement supplements give Paracetamol pills since OTC products are used in patients because most of them are antiviral and analgesic agents. The final objectives of this research were to compare and compare the various paracetamol tablets to show their sales in the Sangli district. Different brands of Ascetaminophen tablets (paracetamol tablets) have been collected from five categories in different pharmacies in the Sangli district. Several official books such as USP and BP were used to test the quality of the screen using different methods and several analytical tests to make this experiment work. In the evaluation of several brands of paracetamol, we were able to determine different parameters such as weight, duality, hardness, drug content, identity test, and dissolution time and dissolution profiles. We are pleased to try variations in weight and geometry that reflect acceptable brands with different brands. UV analysis of several samples revealed that NLT 95 percent active drug content is not available in the brand. Each brand tablet for benchmarking will give different results to each other, but the official books do not exceed the limit reached.
KEYWORDS:
Quality control test, Different brands of paracetamol, Paracetamol, Comparative evaluation.
Cite:
Ganesh B. Vambhurkar, Asha M. Jagtap, Akshata S. Gavade, Manish D. Rajput, Hrutuja V. Kambale, Manohar D. Kengar. Evaluation of five Different Marketed Brands of Paracetamol Tablets using Quality Control Tests. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2018; 8 (4):227-230.
[View HTML]     



Visitor's No. :   110393