Formulation development and
Evaluation of Cleome gyandra based gel
Nilima A. Thombre1*,
Swati Madhukar Gaikwad1, Sanjay J. Kshirsagar1, Daksha
Attarde2
1Department of
Pharmaceutics, MET Institute of Pharmacy, Bhujbal Knowledge City, Adgaon,
Nasik-422003, Maharashtra, India
2Department of
Pharmacognosy, MGV’S College of Pharmacy, Nashik.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: nilimathombre@gmail.com,
swatigaikwad092@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The plant Cleome gyandra family
Cleomaceae has analgesic activity. Extraction of whole plant was done
using by drying and grinding whole plant in water and ethanol solvent by using
soxhlet apparatus. flavonoids and tannins present in the plant are responsible
for the analgesic activity. Herbal gel was developed using laboratory collected
water and ethanol extract whereas water extract contains tannin and ethanol
extract contains flavonoids. Herbal gel formulation was prepared by using
different concentration of gelling agent like carbapol940, different
concentration of tannin and flavonoids obtained from water and ethanol extract.
Herbal gel was evaluated using parameter such as physical appearance like
color, Odor, Consistency, pH, Viscosity, Spreadability, Drug content etc.
Topical gel formulations had pH in the range of 6.8-7.2 i.e. in the neutral
range. Viscosity of gel was determined by Brookfield viscometer, viscosity were
determined, Batches F2, F6 and F8 had high viscosity as compared to other
batches of gel. The spreadability of the gel formulations was determined, by
measuring 1gm of gel between horizontal plates after 1 min. the standardized
weight tied on the upper plate.
Spreadability values of the formulation (F1-F9) were determined. Batches F1-F4
has higher spreadability value in comparison with others batches of gel. The
analgesic activity of plant extract was detected by in vivo study like skin
irritation method and acetic acid induced writing test. The prepared herbal gel
was evaluated for its skin irritant effect, where no erythema or edema was
observed for all the formulations F1 to F9 after 24 hours.
KEYWORDS: Cleome gyandra,
analgesic activity, Gel Evaluation, Skin irritation, acetic acid induced
writhing test.
INTRODUCTION:
India has rich tradition of
plant-based knowledge of healthcare. Herbal product has negligible side
effects. The use of the plant-based medication is gradually becoming popular
throughout the world. Cleome gyandra Linn belonging to family Cleomaceae,
have been used in Indian medicines, used as analgesic used in pain
condition. Gel formulation for several routes of administrations they are
useful as liquird formulation in oral, topical, vaginal Gel. Gel can be clear
formulations when all of the particles completely dissolved in the dispersed
medium. The classification of Gel is single phase and two-phase Gels, and types
of Gels is hydrogels, xerogels, porganogels. Gelling agent used as carbapol,
acacia, pectin, xanthum gum etc.
Gels are easily penetrate
through skin, improve patient compliance due to easy of application. Herbal
gels are less toxic as compared to conventional formulation due to bilayer composition
and structure(1). So the aim of the present study was to formulate
and evaluate of herbal gel containing Cleome gyandra linn plant extract.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant Materials:
The plant Cleome gyandra Linn
was collected (Palkhed Dam, Dindori, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.) The
authentication of the plant was done by Botanical Survey of India Western
Regional Centre, 7-Koregoan Road, Pune-411001, and Maharashtra, India.
Chemicals:
Carbopol 940, Methyl Paraban,
Propyl Paraben, Propylene glycol-400, Triethanolamine.
Extraction of tannic acid from
Cleome gyandra:
20gm Powder of Cleome
gyandra was added in 300mL of water, extraction was done using soxhlet
extraction apparatus. Boil it for 24hrs after that filtered it and dried.
Isolation of tannic
acid from Cleome gyandra:
700mg extract of Cleome
gyandra was added in 50mL of water and this mixture was taken in separating
funnel, in same mixture 10mL 6% of petroleum ether was added and it was
slightly shaken then petroleum ether layer was removed. Chloroform was added in
aqueous layer, removed chloroform layer. Ethyl acetate was added in aqueous
layer, slightly shaken it and separated the water layer. Water layered was
dried and collected tannin. Phytochemical screening was performed for tannin.(15)
Extraction of
flavonoids from Cleome gyandra:
20gm Powder of Cleome
gyandra was added in 300mL of ethanol, extraction was done using soxhlet
extraction apparatus. Boil it for 24hrs after that filtered it and dried.
Method for Preparation of Gel:
In first beaker
0.25gm, 0.50gm and 1g extract of Cleome gyandra was taken and added in
the mixture of Carbopol 940 was dispersed in 50ml of distilled water with
continuous stirring. 5ml of distilled water was taken in another beaker and
required quantity of methyl paraben and propyl paraben were dissolved by
heating on water bath. Cool the solution, then to that added Propylene glycol
400 mixed both beakers solution, Volume make up to 100ml by adding remaining
distilled water. triethanolamine was added drop wise to the formulation for
adjustment of required skin pH (6.8-7) and to obtain the gel at required
consistency. The same method was followed for preparation of control sample
without adding any Cleome gyandra extract(2).
Determination of
total Flavonoids:
Total flavonoids
content of Cleome gyandra was determined by aluminium chloride
colorimetric method. Quercetin was used as standard and the flavonoid content
of the extract was expressed as mg of quercetin equivalent/gm of dried extract.(13)
Method for
detection of Flavonoids:
Preparation of 1M
potassium acetate solution:
9.8gm of potassium
acetate was taken in a 100mL of volumetric flask and small amount of distilled
water was added and dissolved in it. Then the final volume was made up to the
mark by adding required amount of distilled water.(13)
Preparation of
standard quercetin acid solution:
1mg quercetin was dissolved
into 1mL distilled water, so the concentration of the solution is 1mg/mL or
1000µg/mL
which was applied as stock solution then serial dilution was performed in order
to prepare different concentrate solution (10µg/mL, 50µg/mL, 100 µg/mL and
200µg/mL) (13)
Preparation of
blank:
Blank consist of
all the reagents, except for the extract.
Preparation of
extract solution:
200µg/mL
concentrated extract solution was prepared as follows:
Method for
detection of flavonoids:
1mL of plant
extract or standard of different concentration solution was taken in a test
tube. 3mL of ethanol was added, 200µl of 10% aluminium chloride solution was
added into the test tube, 200µl of 1M potassium acetate solution was added into
the test tube, and 5.6mL of distilled water was added into the test tube. The
test tube was then incubated at room temperature for 30 min. to complete the
reaction. Then the absorbance was measured at 420nm using a spectrophotometer
against blank. The total content of flavonoid compounds in plant extract in
quercetin equivalent was calculated by the following formula equition:
C= (e*v) /
m …………………………equation no.1
Where,
C= Total content of flavonoid compounds, mg/g plant extract, in
quercetin equivalent (QE);
e= The concentration of quercetin established from the calibration
curve, mg/mL;
V= The volume of extract mL.
M= The weight of
pure plant extracts, gm.(13)
Tannin contents
determination:
Tannins
concentration in gel was measured by UV spectrophotometer. 1g of the prepared
gel was dissolved in 100mL of phosphate buffer (pH7.4) the solution was
sonicated to dissolve the tannins in phosphate buffer. About 1 mL of solution
was withdrawn and further diluted to 10mL. Then absorbance was measured at
255nm in UV/VIS spectrophotometer. The % tannins content was calculated using
the equation, which was obtained by linear regression analysis calibration
curve of gallic acid in phosphate buffer (pH70.4)(5)
UV- Spectrophotometry:
Gallic acid used s
marker compound for the examination of tannins in the range 200-400nm. A 100ppm
solution of gallic acid in phosphate buffer shows absorption maxima at about
255nm(4).
Preparation of stock solution:
A stock solution of
gallic acid (100μg/mL).
Was prepared. Accurately 10mg of gallic acid was weighed and dissolved in 100mL
of phosphate buffer pH 7.4.(4)
Selection of analytical
concentration range:
The aliquots of
stock solution were transferred to 10mL volumetric flasks and volume was made
up with 10 mL of methanol and phosphate buffer pH 7.4. Respectively, the
absorbance of solutions was measured at 255nm for phosphate buffer pH 7.4. and
plotted against concentration. The concentration range over which the drug
obeyed beer’s law was chosen. Beers law was obeyed in the concentration range
of 5-25μg/mL for
gallic acid(10).
Phytochemical
screening of extract of Cleome gyandra:
Phytochemical
screening and fractionation of phytoconstituent from aqueous. Extract of
gyndropsisgyandra phytochemical screening was performed as mentioned below.(8).
I. Anthraquinones:
Powdered plant
material was boiled with 10% HCl for a few minutes, filtered and allowed to
cool. This was then partitioned against equal volumes of chloroform. Formation
of a rose-pink colour in the aqueous layer on addition of 10% ammonia solution
indicated the presence of combined anthraquinones.(10)
II. Cardiac glycosides:
Sample was
extracted with 10mL of 80% methanol for 5 minutes on a steam bath, filtered and
diluted with an equal volume of distilled water. A few drops of lead acatate
solution were added, shaken and filtered after a while. Filtrate was then
extracted with methylene chloride (two times) and was evaporated to dryness on
a steam bath. Then, about 1mL of 2% 3, 5-dinitro benzoic acid in ethanol was
added to the residue and the solution was made alkaline with 5% NaOH. The
formation of a brownish purple colour is indicative of the presence of
unsaturated lactones.(12)
III. Cyanogenetic
glycosides:
About 1 g of
powdered sample was boiled with distilled water and moist sodium picrate paper
held inside the tube with a cork. A colour change from yellow to brick-red of
the picrate paper was positive for cyanogenetic glycosides.
IV. Steroidal
nucleus:
A few grams of the
powdered material were heated over a Bunsen flame with 10% HCl and FeCl3 for 15
mins, after which it was filtered and cooled. Then extracted with 2 volumes of
CHCl3. The organic phase was concentrated to a small volume and acidified with
5mL acetic anhydride. The formation of a reddish-brown ring at the interface on
carefully pouring conc. H2SO4 is indicative of the presence of a steroidal nucleus(12)
V. Tannins:
Ferric chloride
test:
Plant material was
boiled with water for a few minutes; this was filtered and diluted with
more water. Bluish-black color formation on addition of a few drops of
ferric chloride is indicative of the presence of tannins.
1% solution of
gelatin containing 10% Nacl – precipitate indicates a positive test for
tannins.
Lead acetate
solution (10%) – gives a buff colored precipitate for phenolic compounds.
VI. Test for
saponins:
A. About 1mL of
extract was dilute with water to 20mL and shaken in a graduated cylinder for
10min. a 1 cm layer of foam indicates the presence of saponins.
VII. Test for gums
and mucilage:
B. About 1mL of
extract was added slowly to about 25mL of alcohol with constant stirring
precipitate indicates the presence of gums and mucilage(16).
Determination of
total ash:
About 2 to 3g
accurately weighed powdered was incinerated, of the ground drug in tared
platinum or silica dish at a temperature not exceeding 450şc until free from
carbon, cool and weighed.(14) If a carbon free ash cannot be
obtained in this way, exhaust the charred mass with hot water, collect the
residue on an ash less filter paper, incinerate the residue and filter paper,
the filtrate was, evaporate to dryness and ignite at a temperature not
exceeding 450şC (15)
Determination of
moisture content:
Procedure set forth
here determines the amount of volatile matter (i.e. water drying off from the
drug). About 1.5g of drug (without preliminary drying) after accurately
weighing (accurately weighed to within 0.01g) was placed in tarred evaporating
dish. After placing the above said amount of the drug in the tared evaporating
dish was dried at 105şc for 5 hours, and weighed. Drying and weighing at one
hr. interval was done until difference between two successive weights
corresponds was found not more than 0.25 percent. When constant weight was
reached two consecutive weights after drying for 30 min. and cooling for 30
min. in a desiccators, showed not more than 0.01g difference.(15)
Thin layer chromatography:
For identification
of active constituents, Thin layer chromatography was done on silica coated
plates. The plates were developed in chloroform-methanol-water (65:35:10) as
mobile phase. After development the plates were visualized using iodine
chamber, Gallic acid was used as maker, then the Rf value of marker and sample
was calculated.(8)
Formulation
development:
From the trial batches,
carobopol 940 as a gelling agent in concentration of 1% and 1.5% contains of 1%
and 1.5% of tannins and flavonoids was selected for formulation of herbal gel.(3).
32 Full Factorial
Experimental Design Layout:
Variables for Experimental
Designs
Independent variable :
X1 = Concentration of carbapol 940
X2 = Concentration extract
Dependent variable:
Y1 = Viscosity
Y2
= Spreadability
Y3
= pH
X1 = Carbapol 940
concentration :
0.50gm, 1gm, and
1.5gm was used
X2 = Concentration extract :
0.25gm, 0.50gm and 1gm was use.
Evaluations:
Preliminary
evaluation of formulations was carried out as follows:
Physical evaluation:
Physical appearance and
homogeneity of the prepared gels were evaluated visually,
pH:
The pH of various
formulations was determined by using digital pH meter. To determine pH, 1g of
each gel formulation was transferred into 10mL beaker and pH was measured by
using the digital pH meter. (Raghupstruni, J.L.et al, 2013)
Viscosity:
Viscosity had
been measured using Brookfield Viscometer (model LV-DV- II, Helipath- spindle
type S-96). As the system is Non- Newtonian spindle no.S-96 were used.
Spreadability:
Spreadability was
determined by apparatus, which is suitably modified in the laboratory and used
for the study. It consists of a wooden block, which is provided by pulley at
one end. By this method, spread ability was measured on the basis of ‘slip’ and
‘drag’ characteristics of gels. A ground glass slide was fixed on this block.
An excess of gel (about 1gm) under study was placed on this ground slide. The
gel was then sandwiched between this slide and another glass slide having the
dimension of fixed ground slide and provided with the hook. The top plate was
then subjected to pull off with the help of string attached to the hook and the
time (in seconds) required by the top slide to cover a distance of 7.5 cm be
noted and weight in gram was recorded. Spreadability was calculated using
following equation:
S = M*L
/T …………………………….Equation No.2
Where M= Weight
tide to upper slide,
L= Length proceeded
onward glass,
T= time taken
(Raghupstruni.J.L. etal, 2013)
Table.1
Formulation code |
Variable level |
|
Extract (water extract: ethanol extract) |
X2 carbapol 940 |
|
F1 |
0.25:0.25 |
0.50 |
F2 |
0.25:0.25 |
1 |
F3 |
0.25:0.25 |
1.5 |
F4 |
0.50:0.50 |
0.50 |
F5 |
0.50:0.50 |
1 |
F6 |
0.50:0.50 |
1.5 |
F7 |
1:1 |
0.50 |
F8 |
1:1 |
1 |
F9 |
1:1 |
1.5 |
Table.2
Ingredient |
Batch A |
Batch B |
Batch C |
Batch D |
Batch E |
Batch F |
Batch G |
Batch H |
Batch I |
Extract (gm) |
0.25:0.25 |
0.25:0.25 |
0.25:0.25 |
0.50:0.50 |
0.50:0.50 |
0.50:0.50 |
1:1 |
1:1 |
1:1 |
Carbopol940(gm) |
0.50 |
1 |
1.5 |
0.50 |
1 |
1.5 |
0.50 |
1 |
1.5 |
Propylene glycol(mL) |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Water(mL) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Triethanolamie |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
q.s |
Preservatives |
0.012 |
0.012 |
0.012 |
0.012 |
0.012 |
0.012 |
0.012 |
0.012 |
0.012 |
In-vitro drug release:
The in vitro
diffusion studies of the gel were performed by using cellophane membrane. The
membrane was soaked in phosphate buffer (pH7.4) for 6-8 hr. was clamped
carefully to one end of the hollow glass tube of diffusion cell (2.3cm diameter,
4.16cm2 area). 100mL of phosphate buffer was taken in a beaker,
which was used as receptor compartment for the study. 1gm of each formulation
was spreaded uniformly on the receptor compartment and the temperature was kept
in contact with the receptor compartment and the temperature was maintained
37.50c ± 0.50c the solution on the receptor side were
stirred by magnetic beads. At pre-determined time intervals. 5mL of solution
from the receptor compartment was pipette out and immediately replaced with 5mL
fresh phosphate buffer solution. The tannins were determined
spectrophotometrically at 255nm against appropriate blank. The mount of tannin
permeated of all formulation was calculated.(6)
Equation 3
Cn =
drug concentration of the receptor medium at each sampling
time,
Ci
= drug concentration of the each sample,
V0
and Vi = The volumes of the receiver solution and
the
sample respectively
S
= effective diffusion area
Stability Studies:
The stability study was
evaluated as per ICH guidelines, in the below conditions. (Nataranjan R, et
al., 2014).
In this study,
effect of temperature and humidity was studied by analyzing the optimized batch
kept in environmental chamber maintained at 400C± 20C/
75% ± 5% RH for 1 months. The formulation was evaluated for changes in
appearance, pH, and drug content.
Analgesic activity
study:
Skin irritation
study:
For the skin
irritation test, healthy male mice were divided into three groups of six rats
area of dorsal portion of all the mice were shaved and wiped with surgical
spirit. A constant measure quantity of the formulation was applied over the
test sites. The test sites were observed for any toxic effects, erythema and
edema on skin surface for 48hrs after application.(7)
Table.3
Group (n=6) |
Treatment |
Test |
Herbal gel formulation |
Control |
Aqueous gel base |
Acetic acid induced writhing
in mice:
(1% v/v) was
administered intraperitoneally, to all the groups at the dose of 1mL/kg body
after the application of formulated gels. A writhed was indicated by abdominal
constriction and full extension of hind limb. The number of abdominal
constrictions (writhed) and stretching with a jerk of the hind limb were
counted for 30 minutes after administering acetic acid. Percent protection
against writhed movement was taken as index of analgesic effects. Analgesic
activity was expressed as the percentage inhibition of abdominal constrictions
between control animals and mice pre-treated (n=6) with the herbal gel
formulations using the formula (Control mean – Treated mean) x 100 / Control
mean.(9)
Table.4
Sr. No. |
Group (n=6) |
Treatment, Dose and Route |
1 |
Control |
Aqueous gel base |
3 |
Test 1 (Herbal gel formulation) |
Topical application |
4 |
Test 2 (Herbal gel formulation) |
Topical application. |
B) RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Selection and authentication
of plant:
The authentication of Cleome
gyandra L. was done by Botanical Survey of India,
Western Regional Centre,
7-Koregoan Road, Pune-411001, Maharashtra India.
Table.5
Specimen No. |
Plant Name |
Family |
PG 01 |
Cleome gyandra L. |
Cleomaceae. |
Extraction and
Isolation from Cleome gyandra L.
The percent yield of obtained
tannins from Cleome gyandra L. Was 10.34%.±0.32.
*±SD (n=3
Determination of total
flavonoids:
The total flavonoids content
was to be 0.40mg/mL of extract.
Phytochemical screening of
extract of Cleome gyandra L.
Table.6
SR. No |
TEST |
OBSERVATION |
REFERENCE |
A |
For alkaloids |
|
|
1. |
Dragondrof reagent (potassium bismuth iodide) |
No orange brown precipitate |
Alkaloids might be absent |
2. |
Mayers reagent (mercury potasium iodide) |
No cream precipitate |
Alkaloids might be absent |
3. |
Hagers reagent (saturated picric acid) |
No yellow precipitate |
Alkaloids might be absent |
4. |
Wagners reagent (iodine reagent) |
No reddish brown precipitate |
Alkaloids might be absent |
B |
For Tannins |
|
|
1. |
Dilute ferric chloride (5%) |
Intense blue black |
Tannins might be present |
2. |
gelatin solution (1%) +Nacl solution (10%) |
White precipitate |
Tannins might be present |
3. |
Lead acetate (10%) |
Buff precipitate |
Tannins might be present |
4. |
Dilute HNO3 |
Red colouration |
Tannins might be present |
c. |
For carbohydrate |
|
|
1. |
Molisch's test |
Violet colour ring absent. |
Carbohydrate might be absent. |
D. |
For Saponins |
|
|
1. |
Water was added to the extract |
No foam was observed |
Saponins might be absent |
E. |
For flavonoids |
|
|
1. |
Shinoda Test |
Red coloration |
Flavonoids might be present |
Figure No. 1 Test
for alkaloids
A. Dragondrof test
B.
Mayers reagent
C Hagers
reagent
D
Wagners reagent
Fig. 2. Test for
tannin
A. Gelatin solution
test
B.
Lead acetic test
C. Ferric chloride
test
D.
HNO3 test
Fig. 3. Test for
flavonoids (Shinoda test)
Fig 3. Test for
carbohydrate (Molisch’s test)
From the Table
5 we were said that the extract obtained after soxhlet crude powder of
gyandropsis gyandra in water contained Tannins and ethanol contained
flavonoids.
Determination of Total Ash:
The total ash value of extract
was 9.10%±0.10 which was within the Indian Pharmacopeial Limit (NMT 27%).
Determination of Moisture
content:
The moisture content of
extract was found to be 5.11±0.55 which was within the Indian Pharmacopeial
limit
Thin layer chromatography
Mobile Phase: Toluene-Ethyl
actetate-formic acid-methnol (3:3:0.8:0.2)
1. Rf value of Extracted
Tannins =
Distance moved by the analyte
from origin
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Equation 4
Distance moved by
the front from origin
3.5
––– = 0.63
5.5
2. Rf value of tannic
acid (MARKER)
Distance moved by the analyte
from origin
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Equation 5
Distance moved by the front
from origin
3.6
––– = 0.65
5.5
TLC of Extract
Table.7
Sample |
Calculated Rf value |
Reported Rf value |
Extract |
0.63 |
0.65 |
Figure no.1
The
Calculated Rf value of extract and marker were 0.63 and 0.65 respectively given
in table7. The calculated Rf value was near to observed value. From thin layer
chromatography concluded that tannin might be present in extract.(11)
Table.8
Batches |
pH |
Viscosity(cps) |
Spreadability (g cm/sec) |
Tannins content |
F1 |
6.82±0.09 |
2561±31.34 |
71.16±16.23 |
82%±0.85 |
F2 |
6.17±0.06 |
4125±30.60 |
72.16±12.25 |
89%±0.62 |
F3 |
6.20±0.08 |
2165±92.34 |
64.8±20.85 |
83%±0.45 |
F4 |
6.51±0.15 |
2361±92.30 |
68.8±45.12 |
91%±0.95 |
F5 |
7.07±0.02 |
2135±40.88 |
56.9±23.14 |
85%±0.46 |
F6 |
6.23±0.12 |
4558±51.28 |
58.5±65.14 |
88%±0.35 |
F7 |
6.02±0.08 |
3612±16.24 |
19.21±32.12 |
92%±0.28 |
F8 |
6.93±0.07 |
4850±20.76 |
21.02±84.25 |
94%±0.60 |
F9 |
6.7±0.06 |
3584±25.30 |
26.25±50.23 |
92%±0.25 |
*±SD (n=3)
The formulated gel was
evaluated for pH and found that all formulations had pH in the range of 6.8-7.2
i.e. in the neutral range. The pH of different formulation batches are shown in
Table.7
The topical preparation
ideally should have neutral pH. If the pH of the formulation is acidic skin
irritation, skin hyper pigmentation is occurred and if it is on alkaline side,
the formulation upon application may causes disruption of stratum corneum and
damage to the barrier function of skin
Viscosity:
The viscosity of different gel
formulation was evaluated
From the above
viscosities value observed that formulation containing carbopl940 possess
viscosity. Gel formulation majorly depends upon its viscosity. Viscosity of the
formulation affects the drug release as well as applicability and spreadability
of the gel. If a gel consists of more viscosity then the drug release from the
formulation is decreased and if the same gel possess less viscosity the drug diffuses
immediately into the diffusion medium. Hence, for the gel formulation optimum
viscosity is necessary to get the maximum drug release.(17)
Spreadability:
Spreadability
value of gel
The above
table indicates the spreadability values of the formulation (F1-F9). Batches
F1-F4 has higher spreadability value in comparison with others. The higher
spreadability value indicates less time required by the slide to drag.
Formulation point of view, higher spreadability value is required for
application of the semisolid on the affected area. Hence, it can be concluded
that the developed formulation had good spreadability which was due to carbopol
940 as a gelling agent.
Tannins
content in formulation
The tannins
content of all the formulation F1-F9 were in the range of 82%-94%.
In vitro diffusion
study:
Table 9 In-vitro release
Time (min) |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
1 |
2512.23± 0.35 |
2746.97± 0.56 |
912.123± 0.85 |
1514.516± 0.25 |
1254.177± 0.14 |
1069.35± 0.25 |
1254.48± 0.19 |
1797.95± 0.45 |
1525.14± 0.25 |
2 |
3067.67± 0.56 |
3212.94± 0.42 |
1530.424± 0.82 |
2131.123± 0.43 |
2337.202± 0.53 |
1825.64± 0.16 |
1346.43± 0.36 |
2522.21± 0.58 |
2563.21± 0.31 |
3 |
3126.075± 0.19 |
3331.855± 0.84 |
2113.287± 0.72 |
3131.39± 0.34 |
2096.586± 0.65 |
2254.24± 0.84 |
2351.63± 0.56 |
2251.21± 0.65 |
3541.14± 0.51 |
4 |
4520.658± 0.31 |
4656.861± 0.26 |
3089.877± 0.82 |
3964.933± 0.12 |
3995.349± 0.26 |
3424.5± 0.15 |
2585.13± 0.59 |
3882.15± 0.62 |
2145.15± 0.74 |
5 |
5027.343± 0.53 |
5168.596± 0.32 |
4229.964± 0.84 |
4125.06± 0.24 |
3397.936± 0.62 |
3648.32± 0.61 |
3551.49± 0.18 |
2571.75± 0.85 |
3145.15± 0.25 |
6 |
5886.33± 0.81 |
6366.891± 0.31 |
5321.24± 0.64 |
5477.289± 0.16 |
4022.158± 0.26 |
3543.15± 0.83 |
3145.10± 0.35 |
4656.78± 0.91 |
4521.15± 0.65 |
*±SD (n=3)
The cumulative drug release
and the flux after six hours of formulation batches (F1-F9) are given in Table
10. From the cumulative release it was observed that the formulation containing
Carbopol 940 as a gelling agent had higher value of flux after the period of
six hours. Also the cumulative release of Carbopol 940 gel was observed. .
Table 10: Cumulative release of
tannins from gel.
Batches |
Cum release µg/sqcm |
Flux |
F1 |
5696.33±0.32 |
949.38±0.52 |
F2 |
6426.89±0.26 |
1071.14±0.63 |
F3 |
5137.24±0.56 |
856.31±0.35 |
F4 |
5631.28±0.45 |
938.54±0.34 |
F5 |
46352.15±0.95 |
725.52±0.42 |
F6 |
4972.15±0.61 |
828.87±0.14 |
F7 |
3503.26±0.35 |
583.20±0.61 |
F8 |
4352.15±0.16 |
725.6±0.16 |
F9 |
4215.32±0.65 |
695.5±0.25 |
*±SD (n=3)
Figure 2: Graphical
representation of tannins release
Stability Study:
Effect of temperature and
humidity on formulation was carried out by analyzing the optimized formulation
keeping at 40şC±2şC and 75%±5% relative humidity in stability chamber for one
month. The formulation was analysed for appearance, pH, and Tannins content
formulation.
Table.11
Evaluation Parameters |
Appearance |
PH |
Drug content (%) |
Viscosity (cps) |
SPREADABILITY (g cm/sec ) |
Batch1 |
Brown colour |
6.8±0.16 |
81%±32.16 |
5258cps±0.16 |
79.34±15.28 |
Batch 2 |
Dark brown colour |
6.7±0.82 |
90%±23.02 |
1544cps±0.23 |
72.26±16.23 |
Batch 3 |
Dark brown colour |
7.2±0.52 |
82%±12.34 |
2154cps±0.61 |
62.66±12.25 |
Batch 4 |
Brown colour |
7.1±0.32 |
92%±92.31 |
5164cps±0.12 |
62.82±20.85 |
Batch 5 |
Dark brown colour |
6.8±0.61 |
84%±15.36 |
1232cps±0.34 |
65.8±40.12 |
Batch 6 |
Brown colour |
7±0.63 |
87%±64.23 |
13160cps±0.31 |
52.9±21.10 |
Batch 7 |
Brown colour |
7.2±0.64 |
92%±34.12 |
12000cps±0.34 |
55.5±62.14 |
Batch 8 |
Dark brown colour |
6.9±0.31 |
94%±61.35 |
28300cps±0.92 |
29.01±52.12 |
Batch 9 |
Dark brown colour |
6.5±0.52 |
85±54.58 |
45125cps±0.85 |
24.03±84.15 |
*±SD (n=3)
Table.11
formulation |
Dose (mg/kg.I.P.) Acetic acid (1% v/v) |
No. of writhes in 5-15 min after treatment |
% Inhibition |
F1 |
10 |
42.2±2.541 |
70.25 |
F2 |
8.10 |
15.5±1.58 |
28.31 |
F3 |
11.86 |
32.25±3.85 |
31.18 |
F4 |
14.38 |
28.51±3.51 |
33.54 |
F5 |
14.82 |
21±2.512 |
50.42 |
F6 |
14.83 |
24.2±1.548 |
68.42 |
F7 |
15.65 |
28.6±3.581 |
32.51 |
F8 |
15.65 |
24.4±3.851 |
33.54 |
F9 |
16.07 |
28.1±3.712 |
32.55 |
Analgesic activity study:
Skin irritation test:
The prepared herbal
gel was evaluated for its skin irritant effect, where no erythema or edema was
observed for all the formulations F1 to F9 after 24 hours. Thus the study
indicated that the prepared herbal gel formulation was found to be safe.
Acetic acid (1%
v/v) was administered intraperitoneally, to all the groups at the dose of
1mL/kg body weight 15 min after the application of formulated gels.
Aqueous and ethanol
extract produced significant inhibition of writhing reaction induced by acetic
acid compared to control group. % inhibition of writhed reaction induced by
extracts was in the order as aqueous > ethanol. These extracts delayed the
onset of the writhed response compared to control group.
Intraperitoneally
injection of acetic acid produced pained through activation of chemo sensitive
nociceptors or irritation of the visceral surfaced, which leaded to liberation
of histamines, bradykinins, prostaglandins and serotonins. Thus analgesic
activity of opioid partial agonist and non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
delivery systems can be determined by the writhed test, the mechanism of action
of the analgesic effects of extracts of Cleome gyandra plant could
probably due to the blocked of effect or release of endogenous substances that
excited pained nerved.
Overall we could
say that ethanol and aqueous extract showed analgesic activity, preliminary
phytochemical tests showed the presence of flavonoids in ethanol and tannin in
aqueous extract. Flavonoids and tannins are reported to inhibit prostaglandin
synthesis. From this, we can conclude that the antinociceptive activity
observed may be due to flavonoids and tannins.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
Authors would like to
acknowledge to Trustees, Bhujbal Knowledge City, MET’s institute of pharmacy,
Adgaon, Nasik, Maharashtra, India, for providing the necessary facilities to
carry out this work.
CONCLUSION:
Thus, it was concluded that
the tannins was obtained from aqueous extract and flavonoids was obtained from
ethanol extract whereas tanninsand flavonoids showed analgesic activity. From
the evaluation of gel prepared by tannins and flavonoids we concluded that
prepared gel was safe.
CONFLICT OF
INTEREST:
Nil.
REFERENCES:
1. Ghogare, U. Nirmal,
S. Patil, R. Kharya, M. (2009). Antinociceptive activity of gynandropsis
gynandra leaves. Natural product research, 23, PP. 327-333.
2. Francis, B. Thorat,
P. Lonkar, A. (2008). Toxicity of gynandropsis pentaphyalla Dc extracts against
microbials and its phytochemical profile. Ethnobotanical leaflets, 12, PP.
320-336.
3. Subha, G.
Deepashree, C. (2014). Evaluation of cleome gynandra for its chemical
composition anti-oxidant potential and detection of flavonoids using thin layer
chromatography. Research paper, 3, PP. 2277-8179.
4. Nguelefack, T. Nana,
P. Atsamo, A. Dimo, P. Watcho, A. Njamen, L. Wansi, A. Dongmo, A. (2006).
Analgesic and anticonvulsant effects of extracts from the leaves of kalanchoe
crenata (andrews) Haworth (crassulaceae). journal of ethnopharmacology, 106,
PP.70-75.
5. Ajaiyeoba, O.
(2000). Phytochemical and antimicrobial studies of gynandropsis gynandra and
buchholzia coriaceae extracts. African journal of biomedical research, 3,
PP.161-165.
6. Aulton, M. E. and
Taylor, K. M. 2017. Aulton's Pharmaceutics E-Book: The Design and Manufacture
of Medicines, Elsevier Health Sciences.
7. Jamadar, M. J. and
Shaikh, R. H. Preparation and evaluation of herbal gel formulation.
8. Kandelwal, K.,
Pawar, A., Kokate, C. and Gokhale, S. 1996. Practical pharmacognosy techniques
and experiments. Nirali Prakashan.
9. Khadbadi, S., Deore,
S. and Baviskar, B. 2011. Experimental phytopharmacognosy. Nirali prakashan,
page.
10. Lachman, L., Lieberman, H. A. and Kanig, J. L.
1976. The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy, Lea and Febiger
Philadelphia.
11. Pharmacopeia, I. 2007. Vol-I and II Indian
Pharmacopeia Commission. Ghaziabad, Govt of India: Ministry of Health and Family
welfare, 849-50.
12. Ripathi, K. 2013. Essentials of medical
pharmacology, JP Medical Ltd.Edition.
13. Suman Singh. (2014), Review on research studies
of vasapatra (leaf of adhatoda vasica nees), International Journal of
Pharmacognosy. 1(3), pp 168-173.
14. Keid, B.R. and Jat, R.K., 2017. Isolation and
characterization of Vasicine from Adhatoda vasica (Adusa). IJRDPL, 6,
pp.2590-2596.
15. Khadabadi S.S, Deore S.L and Baviskar B.A.,
2011. Textbook of Experimental Phytopharmacongnocy, Nirali Prakashan: 1-11.
16. Khursheed, A., Devender, P. and Ansari, S.H.,
2010. Phytochemical and pharmacological investigations on adhatoda zeylanica
(medic.): A review. Pharmacognosy Journal, 2(12), pp.513-519.
17. Kumar, K.S., Debjit, B., Pankaj, T. and Rakesh,
K., 2010. Indian traditional herbs Adhatoda vasica and its medicinal
application. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2(1), pp.240-245.
Received on 10.02.2020
Modified on 14.03.2020
Accepted on 02.04.2020 ©Asian Pharma Press
All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm.
Tech. 2020; 10(2):71-80.
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5713.2020.00014.8